Prediction of Ionospheric Scintillation with ConvGRU Networks Using GNSS Ground-Based Data across South America
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study investigates the relationship between geomagnetic activities and ionospheric scintillations, focusing on how solar and geomagnetic parameters influence ionospheric disturbances across varying time frames and latitudes. Utilizing indices such as Kp, Dst, sunspot numbers, and the F10.7 solar flux, we elucidate the dynamics influencing ionospheric conditions, which are vital for the reliability of satellite communications, particularly in low-latitude regions. Our analysis demonstrates a clear correlation between periods of high solar activity and increased geomagnetic disturbances, leading to heightened ionospheric scintillations, such as occurred during the solar maximum of 2015. In contrast, 2020—a solar minimum period—exhibited fewer disturbances, highlighting the impact of solar activity levels on ionospheric conditions. Innovatively employing ConvGRU networks, this research advances the modeling and prediction of ionospheric scintillations by integrating deep learning techniques suited to the spatiotemporal complexities of ionospheric data. The ConvGRU model effectively captures both temporal sequences and spatial distributions, offering enhanced accuracy in depicting ionospheric scintillation patterns crucial for satellite-based navigation and communication systems. Ground-based GNSS data from 121 stations across South America, collected during 2015 and 2020, provide a robust dataset for our analysis. The study highlights the influence of the solar cycle on ionospheric scintillations, with the years of maximum and minimum solar activity showing significant differences in scintillation intensity and frequency. Our evaluation of the ConvGRU models using statistical parameters demonstrated their potential for reliable ionospheric scintillation prediction. The research underscores the necessity of integrating adaptive mechanisms within models to effectively handle the dynamic nature of ionospheric disturbances influenced by external geomagnetic and solar factors. This study enhances the understanding of ionospheric scintillations and significantly advances predictive modeling capabilities using advanced machine learning techniques. The potential establishment of real-time alert systems for ionospheric disturbances could significantly benefit civilian applications, enhancing the operational efficiency of technologies reliant on accurate ionospheric information.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".