MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

THE ROLE OF THE ARTS IN ENHANCING EDUCATION, CULTURE, COMPASSION, AND COMING TO GRIPS WITH THE CHALLENGES OF THE PRESENT AND THE FUTURE

2024· article· en· W4401077855 on OpenAlexaff
Paul D. Schafer

Bibliographic record

VenueДуховність особистості методологія теорія і практика · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducational Methods and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsScience World at Telus World of Science
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThe artsCompassionMythologyArts in educationNatural (archaeology)AestheticsSociologyVisual artsHistoryPolitical scienceArtLiteratureLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

While the arts and the sciences are among the most important activities in life and the world, a severe disharmony exists between them at present due to the fact that the sciences are seen and treated primarily as “hard activities” and “the basics in life” while the arts are often seen and treated by many people and organizations as “soft activities” and “the frills in life.’ Over the last few decades, this has resulted in substantial increases in funding for the sciences and significant decreases in funding for the arts, thereby creating a destructive rift or imbalance between the arts and sciences that must be corrected as soon as possible by “doubling down” of the development of the arts and recognizing that they have a crucial role in the world of the future by enhancing education and culture very considerably and a great deal else. This can be achieved in a multitude of ways, such as treating the arts as ends in themselves as well as means to other ends, expanding knowledge, understanding, and awareness in the world of all the arts’ many diverse aspects and manifestations, using artistic symbols, metaphors, myths, and legends to enhance our appreciation and respect for all the different cultures and civilizations in the world in breadth and depth, and shining the spotlight on the natural environment and all its diverse elements and species by taking advantage of the unique features of all the various arts and art forms and most notably music. This can assist us in coming to grips with the environmental crisis, achieving ecological sustainability, reducing the severe inequalities that exist in income and wealth in the world through more sharing and caring, and most of all, making the world a much more humane and harmonious place by unleashing the greatest strength of the arts of all, namely bringing a great deal more spirituality, compassion, feeling, emotion, sensitivity, and reverence into the world.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.058

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0120.037
Scholarly communication0.0220.015
Open science0.0010.014
Research integrity0.0050.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueДуховність особистості методологія теорія і практикаSame topicEducational Methods and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207