MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Cardiovascular Health Starts in the Womb

2024· review· en· W4401093970 on OpenAlexafffund
Bonita Falkner, Barbara T. Alexander, Anne Monique Nuyt, Andrew M. South, Julie R. Ingelfinger

Bibliographic record

VenueHypertension · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBirth, Development, and Health
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
FundersNational Institute of General Medical SciencesNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsEpidemiologyMedicineOffspringBlood pressureDiseasePediatricsPercentileLongitudinal studyLow birth weightPregnancyInternal medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hypertension has largely been viewed as a disorder of adulthood. Historically, blood pressure (BP) was not routinely measured in children because hypertension was considered uncommon in childhood. It was not until the 1970s that it was apparent that in childhood BP levels were normally lower compared with those in adults, were related to age and growth, and that abnormal BP in children needed different definitions. Based on the distribution of BP levels in available child cohorts, the 95th percentile of BP levels became the definition of hypertension in children and adolescents-an epidemiological definition. Subsequent clinical and epidemiological research identified associated risk factors in childhood that linked abnormal BP in youth with hypertension in adulthood. In the 1980s, the Barker hypothesis, based on observations that low birth weight could be linked to cardiovascular disease in adulthood, promoted further research spanning epidemiological, clinical, and basic science on the childhood origins of hypertension. This review focuses on recent findings from both longitudinal maternal-child cohorts and experimental models that examine both maternal and offspring conditions associated with risks of subsequent cardiovascular disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.133
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHypertensionSame topicBirth, Development, and HealthFrench-language works237,207