A Multicenter Study of COPD and Cognitive Impairment: Unraveling the Interplay of Quantitative CT, Lung Function, HIF-1α, and Clinical Variables
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose: The exact link between cognitive impairment (CI) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is still limited. Thus, we aim to find the relationship and interaction of quantitative CT (QCT), lung function, HIF-1α, and clinical factors with the development of CI among COPD patients. Patients and Methods: A cross-sectional multicentre study was conducted from January 2022 to December 2023. We collected clinical data, spirometry, CT images, and venous blood samples from 114 COPD participants. Cognitive impairment assessment using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Indonesian version (MoCA-Ina) with a cutoff value 26. The QCT analysis consists of lung density, airway wall thickness, pulmonary artery-to-aorta ratio (PA:A), and pectoralis muscles using 3D Slicer software. Serum HIF-1α analysis was performed using ELISA. Results: We found significant differences between %LAA − 950 , age, COPD duration, BMI, FEV 1 pp, and FEV 1 /FVC among GOLD grades I–IV. Only education duration was found to correlate with CI (r = 0.40; p < 0.001). We found no significant difference in HIF-1α among GOLD grades (p = 0.149) and no correlation between HIF-1α and CI (p = 0.105). From multiple linear regression, we observed that the MoCA-Ina score was influenced mainly by %LAA − 950 (p = 0.02) and education duration (p = 0.01). The path analysis model showed both %LAA and education duration directly and indirectly through FEV 1 pp contributing to CI. Conclusion: We conclude that the utilization of QCT parameters is beneficial as it can identify abnormalities and contribute to the development of CI, indicating its potential utility in clinical decision-making. The MoCA-Ina score in COPD is mainly affected by %LAA − 950 and education duration. Contrary to expectations, this study concludes that HIF-1α does not affect CI among COPD patients. Keywords: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cognitive impairment, emphysema lung, hypoxia inducible factor
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".