Analysis of the complement component C4 gene with schizophrenia subphenotypes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The complement component C4 gene has been identified as a strong marker for schizophrenia (SCZ) risk. The C4 gene has a complex genetic structure consisting of variable structural elements (C4A, C4B, C4L, and C4S) and compound structural forms (C4AL, C4BL, C4AS and C4BS). In addition, the variations in C4 structural forms may have a direct or indirect effect on the brain expression level of C4A and C4B proteins. Previous studies have associated C4AL with higher brain C4A expression and sex-dimorphism of C4 between males and females was observed. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 613 patients with DSM-IV SCZ or schizoaffective disorder (SCZ-AFF) were recruited to investigate the relationship between C4 gene variants and clinical characteristics of SCZ (age of onset, symptom severity, and global assessment of functioning (GAF)). This study also explored the effect of sex on the association of C4 with SCZ. 434 patients were included in the final analyses after genetic quality control. RESULTS: We observed associations between C4 and clinical characteristics of SCZ (age of onset, symptom severity, GAF) and found significant differences when males and females were examined separately. CONCLUSION: Overall, our preliminary findings encourage future investigations of C4 in SCZ-related phenotypes, including antipsychotic response and side effects. The study sample was of moderate size; therefore, further studies in larger samples are needed to extend and validate these results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".