MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401108970 · doi:10.1109/ticps.2024.3435178

IP2FL: Interpretation-Based Privacy-Preserving Federated Learning for Industrial Cyber-Physical Systems

2024· article· en· W4401108970 on OpenAlexaff
Danyal Namakshenas, Abbas Yazdinejad, Ali Dehghantanha, Reza M. Parizi, Gautam Srivastava

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Industrial Cyber-Physical Systems · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Canadian institutionsBrandon UniversityUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCyber-physical systemInterpretation (philosophy)Computer scienceComputer securityInformation privacyInternet privacyFederated learningArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The expansion of Industrial Cyber-Physical Systems (ICPS) has introduced new challenges in security and privacy, highlighting a research gap in effective anomaly detection while preserving data confidentiality. In the ICPS landscape, where vast amounts of sensitive industrial data are exchanged, ensuring privacy is not just a regulatory compliance issue but a critical shield against industrial espionage and cyber threats. Existing solutions often compromise data privacy for enhanced security, leaving a significant void in protecting sensitive information within ICPS networks. Addressing this, our research presents theIP2FLmodel, an Interpretation-based Privacy-Preserving Federated Learning approach tailored for ICPS. This model combines Additive Homomorphic Encryption (AHE) for privacy with advanced feature selection methods and Shapley Values (SV) for enhanced explainability. The proposed solution mitigates privacy concerns in federated learning, where traditional methods fall short due to computational constraints and lack of interpretability. By integrating AHE, theIP2FLmodel minimizes computational overhead and ensures data privacy. Our dual feature selection approach optimizes system performance while incorporating SV to provide critical insights into model decisions, advancing the field towards more transparent and understandable AI systems in ICPS. The validation of our model using ICPS-specific datasets demonstrates its effectiveness and potential for practical applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.005
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations41
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Industrial Cyber-Physical SystemsSame topicPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in DataFrench-language works237,207