MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401110374 · doi:10.1109/wfpst58552.2024.00030

Navigating Change: Enhancing Transportation Resilience in the Face of Climate Change - A Moroccan Case Study

2024· article· en· W4401110374 on OpenAlexaff
Soukaina El Maachi, Rachid Saadane, Abdellah Chehri, Abdeslam Jakimi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInfrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResilience (materials science)Face (sociological concept)Climate changeComputer scienceEnvironmental resource managementBusinessEnvironmental planningEnvironmental scienceGeologySociologyOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Climate change manifested through extreme weather events such as hurricanes, floods, wildfires, and rising sea levels, poses significant threats to transportation infrastructure, disrupts services, and raises safety concerns with dangerous repercussions on the broader economic sector. Drawing insights from the Moroccan Ministry of Equipment and Water on climate change and resilience, we delve into the unique challenges and vulnerabilities faced by the transportation sector in Morocco amidst a changing climate. The study explores advanced technologies, particularly artificial intelligence (AI) and computer vision, to mitigate the impacts of climate change on transportation safety. Emphasizing the need for foresighted measures, we explore applications such as computer vision for weather pattern recognition by analyzing satellite imagery and real-time monitoring via video feeds. This approach enables accurate and timely predictions of extreme weather events, facilitating improved preparedness and response strategies. The findings contribute to the broader discourse on climate change adaptation and sustainable development, offering a nuanced perspective based on the specific realities of the Moroccan transportation scene.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.411
Threshold uncertainty score0.842

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicInfrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability AnalysisFrench-language works237,207