MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

THD Mitigation in Parallel Voltage Source Converters Through Fuzzy Logic Control and SVPWM Technique

2024· article· en· W4401110960 on OpenAlexaff
Khaled Ghambirlou, Gerry Moschopoulos

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrogrid Control and Optimization
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConvertersTotal harmonic distortionFuzzy logicComputer scienceControl theory (sociology)VoltageFuzzy control systemControl (management)Electronic engineeringControl engineeringElectrical engineeringEngineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper aims to design and analyze the performance of parallel voltage source converters (VSCs) using space vector pulse width modulation (SVPWM) topology and to control the output voltage and current of the VSCs using PI and fuzzy logic controllers (FLCs). The project studies the performance of the parallel VSCs with SVPWM in terms of total harmonic distortion (THD). The proposed SVPWM technique is grounded in recent advances in fuzzy logic optimization methods, known for their suitability in solving multi-objective problems. Utilizing fuzzy logic, the technique aims to determine optimum firing angles that minimize harmonic content. The system includes parallel VSCs, RL load, LC filter and grid. The methodology entails the simulation of parallel VSCs utilizing SVPWM topology in MATLAB/Simulink, introducing FLCs into the simulation, and subsequently evaluating the parallel VSCs' performance under SVPWM topology. Additionally, the stability and robustness of the parallel VSCs, integrating both SVPWM and FLCs, are systematically analyzed. The findings reveal that employing FLCs for controlling the output voltage and current in parallel VSCs leads to a notable reduction in THD compared to conventional control methods lacking optimization methods. Comparative assessments are conducted between the performance of parallel VSCs utilizing the SVPWM technique and FLCs versus SVPWM methods without optimization technique, with a thorough analysis of stability and robustness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.992
Threshold uncertainty score0.416

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMicrogrid Control and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207