MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401118089 · doi:10.47391/jpma.10069

The domperidone dilemma in Pakistan: Balancing access and safety concerns

2024· article· en· W4401118089 on OpenAlexaff
Ahmed Muaaz Umer, Z. A. Hassan, Mamin Mehboob

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Pakistan Medical Association · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGastrointestinal motility and disorders
Canadian institutionsAtomic Energy (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDomperidoneMedicinePopulationNauseaInternal medicineDopamineEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Madam, Domperidone is used in the treatment of nausea and vomiting as an antiemetic and prokinetic drug. Its pro-kinetic effects mainly manifest in the upper gastrointestinal tract by acting as a dopamine receptor antagonist [1]. However, the drug has been banned by the FDA in the USA due to its association with cardiac arrhythmias and cardiac arrest. A recent meta-analysis has shown a statistically significant association between sudden cardiac death [2] and the use of domperidone which raises the question of drug usage in Pakistan as an over-the-counter medication. The meta-analysis considers six different case-control studies, between 2005 and 2016, that have shown an increase in the risk of sudden cardiac death and ventricular arrhythmias associated with domperidone. The observational studies were conducted in North America, Asia, and Europe, proving that it is a global phenomenon, stemming from the use of the drug. The forest plot of the studies has been mentioned later in the abstract showing heterogeneity at 0%, OR ratio 1.69 with 95% CI (1.46-1.95). To further highlight the risks associated with domperidone, another study has reported that the safety index of the drug is 5.25, which is remarkably lower than the international safety ratio of 30[3]. The safety index, or therapeutic index, is the ratio of the toxic dose in 50% of the population (TD50) and the effective dose in 50% of the population (ED50) with the same therapeutic effect. A wider safety index indicates more room for error in the drug's therapeutic effect; essentially a larger barrier before the drug is toxic. With a safety index of 5.25, the action potential duration is markedly increased, resulting in arrhythmias. The author also comments on restricting the drug only to patients where the potential benefit is proven to justify the risks. In Pakistan, Domperidone is readily available as an over-the-counter drug. The casual availability raises the concern that the associated safety issues must be critically evaluated to determine whether the uses of the drug outweigh the risk of sudden cardiac death and ventricular arrhythmias [4] mentioned in these studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.111
Threshold uncertainty score0.378

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Pakistan Medical AssociationSame topicGastrointestinal motility and disordersFrench-language works237,207