Numerical Investigation of Mass and Heat Transfer in a New Coaxial with Shell-and-Tube Heat Exchanger
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the present article, a novel coaxial with shell-and-tube (CWST) heat exchanger is developed and simulated using Ansys-Fluent®, and its results are compared with those of the shell-and-tube heat exchanger from which it is derived.The geometry of this new exchanger was given, specifying the different types of fluids it can contain and their circulations, and a theoretical calculation based on the NTU method (number of transfer units method) is used to validate the simulations.In order to be able to analyse the phenomena occurring inside this exchanger, the fluid temperature, pressure, and velocity distribution figures are given with the evolutionary curve of some performance parameters (the heat, the pressure losses, the ratio between heat and pressure losses, the heat flux and the overall heat transfer coefficient) as a function of the cold fluid volume rate.At the end the various advantages it can give to enhance the efficiency of heat transfer, to reduce manufacturing and operating costs, as well as its potential for further research on the improvement of the design were explained.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".