Isovalent Co-Substitution of Iron and Titanium into Single-Crystal NMC622
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Substitutional Li[Ni0.6Mn0.2Co0.2]O2 oxides (known as NMC622) were made by all-dry synthesis with Fe and Ti substituting Co and Mn, respectively. The substitutions were performed in three series, Fe substitution for Co, Ti substitution for Mn, and Fe and Ti co-substitution for Co and Mn, according to the formula Li(Ni0.6Mn0.2−y Co0.2−x Fe x Ti y )O2. The resulting oxides were evaluated as cathode materials for Li-ion batteries. Fe-substitution for Co resulted in increased intersite mixing, resulting in increased polarization and capacity fade. Ti-substitution for Mn also resulted in increased intersite mixing, but the mixing was due to Ti3+ in the Li-layer. As a result, Ti-substituted NMCs had improved capacity retention and reduced polarization. These effects were independent of each other, so that Ti could partially offset the negative aspects of Fe-substitution. Additionally, layered Mn-free Li(Ni0.6Ti0.2Co0.2)O2 (NTC622) was produced as an endmember of this series for the first time with low intersite mixing and superior electrochemical performance in comparison to previous reports. These results demonstrate benefits of all-dry Ti-substitution in NMC and the all-dry synthesis method as an avenue towards new cathode composition discovery.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".