MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401151291 · doi:10.18592/pk.v12i1.11109

Potensi daya tarik wisata Perpustakaan Kota Bandung dalam upaya mengembangkan edu-tourism

2024· article· id· W4401151291 on OpenAlexaff
Diah Sri Rejeki, Rina Rohma Renggani, Merryam Agustine, Haria Saputry Wahyuni, Wulandini Rahmah Syaripyani, Nasywa Athiya Syahla

Bibliographic record

VenuePustaka Karya Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi · 2024
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCommunity-based Tourism Development and Sustainability
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTourismGeographyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Perpustakaan berfungsi sebagai wahana pendidikan, penelitian, pelestarian, informasi, dan rekreasi dalam rangka meningkatkan kecerdaskan dan keberdayaan bangsa. Penerapan fungsi rekreasi di perpustakaan telah dikembangkan dengan adanya program edu-tourism. Edu-tourism merupakan penggabungan antara konsep wisata dengan pendidikan. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan tujuan untuk mengetahui potensi daya tarik perpustakaan untuk pengembangan program edu-tourism. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah kualitatif, dan proses analisis data dilakukan melalui tahapan reduksi data, penyajian data dan kesimpulan atau verifikasi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa potensi daya tarik perpustakaan untuk pengembangan program edu-tourism di Dinas Kearsipan dan Perpustakaan Kota Bandung, antara lain: (1) Arsip sejarah kota Bandung; (2) Pameran tematik; (3) Koleksi perpustakaan; (4) Kegiatan Pendidikan; (5) Ruang baca dan studi. Perpustakaan Kota Bandung memiliki potensi daya tarik yang besar dalam mengembangkan edu-tourism, membawa manfaat pendidikan dan pengalaman wisata kepada masyarakat. Dengan koleksi arsip dan perpustakaan yang kaya, mencakup dokumen sejarah, artefak budaya, dan sumber daya lainnya, perpustakaan ini menawarkan peluang pembelajaran langsung yang mendalam dan otentik.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.072
Threshold uncertainty score0.240

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0720.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePustaka Karya Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Perpustakaan dan InformasiSame topicCommunity-based Tourism Development and SustainabilityFrench-language works237,207