Effect of recombinant bovine granulocyte colony-stimulating factor treatment during the peripartum period on postpartum diseases, reproductive performance, and milk production in Holstein cattle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To boost the immune function around parturition, recombinant bovine granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rbG-CSF) has been used to increase the number of neutrophils. Therefore, the aim of this study was to quantify the effect of rbG-CSF administration on the incidence of postpartum pathologies, reproductive performance, and milk production during the first three months of lactation. A total of 199 Holstein cows from one herd were included and were randomly allocated into two groups: Control (n = 103) and rbG-CSF (n = 96). Cows in the rbG-CSF group received 2 doses of a rbG-CSF injectable formulation, one 7 days before the expected date of calving and the other within 24 h after calving. For 6 weeks following calving, animals were examined weekly to assess the presence of postpartum pathologies. Milk production, protein and fat content, and somatic cell count were determined monthly by the regional dairy herd improvement association. Data about the reproductive performance were collected from on-farm software. To analyse the effect of treatment on the incidence of postpartum pathologies, Pearson's χ2 test and multivariable logistic regressions were performed. The effect on reproductive performance was analysed using Cox proportional hazard regression analysis for days open, binary logistic regression for first service conception rate and Oneway ANOVA test for the number of artificial inseminations. The effects of treatment on milk yield and milk composition were checked using GLM repeated measures analysis. No statistically significant differences were observed between treatment groups for any of the parameters evaluated. Only parity had a significant effect on days open and milk production (p < 0.05). In conclusion, in the present study no evidence was found that rbG-CSF could have an effect on the reproductive and productive parameters evaluated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".