Loss of <i>RREB1</i> reduces adipogenesis and improves insulin sensitivity in mouse and human adipocytes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract There are multiple independent genetic signals at the Ras-responsive element binding protein 1 ( RREB1 ) locus associated with type 2 diabetes risk, fasting glucose, ectopic fat, height, and bone mineral density. We have previously shown that loss of RREB1 in pancreatic beta cells reduces insulin content and impairs islet cell development and function. However, RREB1 is a widely expressed transcription factor and the metabolic impact of RREB1 loss in vivo remains unknown. Here, we show that male and female global heterozygous knockout ( Rreb1 +/- ) mice have reduced body length, weight, and fat mass on high-fat diet. Rreb1 +/- mice have sex- and diet-specific decreases in adipose tissue and adipocyte size; male mice on high-fat diet had larger gonadal adipocytes, while males on standard chow and females on high-fat diet had smaller, more insulin sensitive subcutaneous adipocytes. Mouse and human precursor cells lacking RREB1 have decreased adipogenic gene expression and activated transcription of genes associated with osteoblast differentiation, which was associated with Rreb1 +/- mice having increased bone mineral density in vivo . Finally, human carriers of RREB1 T2D protective alleles have smaller adipocytes, consistent with RREB1 loss-of-function reducing diabetes risk.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".