Novel cell wall polysaccharide genotypes and structures of lactococcal strains isolated from milk and fermented foods
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The biosynthetic machinery for cell wall polysaccharide (CWPS) formation in Lactococcus lactis and Lactococcus cremoris is encoded by the cwps locus. The CWPS of lactococci typically consists of a neutral rhamnan component, which is embedded in the peptidoglycan, and to which a surface-exposed side chain oligosaccharide or polysaccharide pellicle (PSP) component is attached. The rhamnan component has been shown for several lactococcal strains to consist of a repeating rhamnose trisaccharide subunit, while the side chain is diverse in glycan content, polymeric status and glycosidic linkage architecture. The observed structural diversity of the CWPS side chain among lactococcal strains is reflected in the genetic diversity within the variable 3′ region of the corresponding cwps loci. To date, four distinct cwps genotypes (A, B, C, D) have been identified, while eight subtypes (C1 through to C8) have been recognized among C-genotype strains. In the present study, we report the identification of three novel subtypes of the lactococcal cwps C genotypes, named C9, C10 and C11. The CWPS of four isolates representing C7, C9, C10 and C11 genotypes were analysed using 2D NMR to reveal their unique CWPS structures. Through this analysis, the structure of one novel rhamnan, three distinct PSPs and three exopolysaccharides were elucidated. Results obtained in this study provide further insights into the complex nature and fascinating diversity of lactococcal CWPSs. This highlights the need for a holistic view of cell wall-associated glycan structures which may contribute to robustness of certain strains against infecting bacteriophages. This has clear implications for the fermented food industry that relies on the consistent application of lactococcal strains in mesophilic production systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".