MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Symmetry and planar chirality measured with a log-polar transformation in a transmission electron microscope

2024· article· en· W4401170458 on OpenAlexafffund
Amir H. Tavabi, Paolo Rosi, Raimond B. G. Ravelli, Abril Gijsbers, Enzo Rotunno, Tuğrul Güner, Yingwen Zhang, Alberto Roncaglia, Luca Belsito, G. Pozzi, Thibaud Denneulin, G. C. Gazzadi, M. R. Ghosh, Reindert Nijland, Stefano Frabboni, Peter J. Peters, Ebrahim Karimi, Peter Tiemeijer, Rafal E. Dunin‐Borkowski, Vincenzo Grillo

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Applied · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdvanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersHorizon 2020 Framework ProgrammeCanada Research ChairsCentral Remedial ClinicEuropean Commission
KeywordsChirality (physics)Planar chiralityAngular momentumPlanarPhysicsPolarElectron microscopeElectronElectron tomographyOpticsHigh-resolution transmission electron microscopySymmetry (geometry)Transmission electron microscopyScanning transmission electron microscopyQuantum mechanicsChemistryGeometrySymmetry breakingMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chirality can appear at many length scales in nature. In this study the authors introduce planar chirality as a quantitative geometric measure of chirality for two-dimensional objects. They apply this measure to evaluate the chirality of nanometer-sized structures with an electron microscope. They employ an innovative electron-optics device, the orbital-angular-momentum sorter, which applies a log-polar conformal mapping to the electron wave function and reaches near-optimal resolution in orbital angular momentum.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.269
Threshold uncertainty score0.474

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review AppliedSame topicAdvanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207