Audiovestibular Dysfunction in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients: A Systematic Review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Audiovestibular dysfunction in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus has been underestimated for decades. Systemic lupus erythematosus can affect both the auditory and vestibular systems simultaneously. Several potential pathophysiological mechanisms behind systemic lupus erythematosus-related audiovestibular dysfunction have been proposed, including antibody-mediated immune responses, cell-mediated cytotoxicity, immune complex deposition in microvessels, central involvement in the audiovestibular pathway, and ototoxicity from medications used in systemic lupus erythematosus treatment. Currently available tests to evaluate audiovestibular function in systemic lupus erythematosus patients are neither specific nor sensitive. Nevertheless, there is no consensus regarding the efficacy of treatments for audiovestibular dysfunction in such patients. In this systematic review, we electronically searched the PubMed, Embase, ClinicalKey, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect platforms to find eligible articles. The first inspection date was on 29 December 2023 and the final update search date was on 11 June 2024. Further, we rated the quality of the included articles with Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Based upon the aforementioned systematic review process, we have summarized the currently available evidence on the characteristics, pathophysiology, examination, and treatment of audiovestibular dysfunction related to systemic lupus erythematosus. Furthermore, we have proposed a specific steroid treatment protocol to manage audiovestibular dysfunction related to systemic lupus erythematosus. Audiovestibular dysfunction related to systemic lupus erythematosus may be responsive to adequate treatments, potentially allowing for reversibility if the disease is recognized and managed in a timely manner. Therefore, to provide clinically relevant evidence to clinicians, we have organized this literature review article to summarize the available evidence on the characteristics, pathophysiology, examination, and treatment of audiovestibular dysfunction in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Finally, based on our modified steroid treatment protocol, we would like to provide a new treatment strategy to clinicians to manage systemic lupus erythematosus-related audiovestibular dysfunction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".