Assessing Structures and Solution Behaviors of Molecular and Ionic Cocrystals with a Common Bioactive Molecule: 2,4-Pyridinedicarboxylic Acid with Tranexamic Acid and Nicotinamide
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Cocrystals of 2,4-pyridinedicarboxylic acid ( PDA ) with either nicotinamide ( NTD ) or tranexamic acid ( TXA ) as ( PDA)·(NTD) and 2(PDA)·(TXA), respectively, are reported, with the former being a molecular cocrystal and the latter being an ionic cocrystal. Single-crystal structure analyses showed that PDA and its coformers are sustained by neutral and ionic hydrogen bonds. Suspensions of (PDA)·(NTD) resulted in complete conversion to PDA monohydrate after 48 h, while 2(PDA)·(TXA) was thermodynamically stable at a lower pH and showed a 2-fold increase in the PDA concentration, relative to pure PDA monohydrate under similar conditions. Thermal characterization of 2(PDA)·(TXA) displayed a lower melting point and a lower heat of fusion, relative to the pure components. Powder dissolution studies were evaluated for PDA, (PDA)·(NTD), and 2(PDA)·(TXA) and the corresponding physical mixtures. The percent of PDA dissolved rapidly reached near 100% for most cases; however, for 2(PDA)·(TXA), complete dissolution was not achieved, and the amount of PDA dissolved decreased to 85% after 3 h. Instability of 2(PDA)·(TXA) was likely a result of a high solution pH during dissolution, and our results confirm that the solution pH plays a key role in determining the solution behavior and phase stability of the cocrystals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".