MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401223664 · doi:10.1192/bjo.2024.698

Trajectories of Psychotropic Medications Before and After an Autism Diagnosis Vary by Age and Sex

2024· article· en· W4401223664 on OpenAlexaffabout
Sébastien Brodeur, Isabelle Dufour, Yohann Chiu, Josiane Courteau, Mélanie Couture

Bibliographic record

VenueBJPsych Open · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicAutism Spectrum Disorder Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de SherbrookeUniversité de SherbrookeUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutismMedicinePsychiatryPsychologyClinical psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aims Interventions to support people with autism are multidimensional, but primarily psychosocial in nature. These interventions include behavioural, educational and support therapies. Some psychotropic medications are used to manage medical and psychiatric comorbidities associated with autism, which interfere with daily social and occupational functioning or limit the implementation of psychosocial interventions. The aim of this study is to describe the trajectories of psychotropic medications in people newly diagnosed with autism according to sex and age. Methods This is a retrospective cohort study based on medico-administrative data from the Régie de l'assurance santé du Québec. The cohort included all people living in the province of Quebec (Canada) with a first diagnosis of autism (incident cases) recorded during hospitalisation or during a medical visit between January 2012 and December 2016 (index date: first diagnosis). Only individuals covered by the public prescription drug insurance plan one year before and one year after the index date were included. A patient was considered exposed to a drug from the date a prescription was claimed at a community pharmacy and for the time the drug was provided. However, as no information was available on inpatient drug, the drug trajectory represents the outpatient drug trajectory. The five classes of psychotropic drugs considered were: 1) anticonvulsants and mood stabilisers; 2) antipsychotics; 3) antidepressants; 4) anxiolytics/hypnotics; and 5) psychostimulants. Drug trajectories are represented using state sequence analyses. Results The study cohort included 3284 people, of which 867 (26.4%) were females and 2417 (73.6%) were males. Overall, 51.6% of the cohort claimed a psychotropic medication in the year preceding diagnosis and 61.1% in the following year, with higher proportions among females and increasing with age. Psychostimulants were the most prescribed medications among people diagnosed at ages ≤12 years, while antipsychotic use increased considerably with age, becoming the most commonly prescribed medication among those diagnosed in adulthood (≥18 years), with use rates reaching as much as 80% among those diagnosed between 36 and 60 years. State sequence analyses demonstrate slight variations in the use of psychotropic medications over time, but significant variations by age category and sex. Conclusion Although psychosocial interventions are recognised by clinical practice guidelines as the cornerstone of interventions for people with autism, the use of psychotropic medications is widespread. This highlights a significant gap between the recommendations of these guidelines and what is observed in the real world.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.478
Threshold uncertainty score0.464

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBJPsych OpenSame topicAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchFrench-language works237,207