Transposable elements contribute to tissue-specific gene regulation in humans
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Transposable elements (TEs) contribute to approximately half of the human genome, and along with many other functions, they have been known to play a role in gene regulation in the genome. With TEs' active/repressed states varying across tissue and cell types, they have the potential to regulate gene expression in a tissue-specific manner. OBJECTIVE AND METHODS: To provide a systematic analysis of TEs' contribution in tissue-specific gene regulation, we examined the regulatory elements and genes in association with TE-derived regulatory sequences in 14 human cell lines belonging to 10 different tissue types using the functional genomics data from the ENCODE project. Specifically, we separately analyzed regulatory regions identified by three different approaches (DNase hypersensitive sites (DHS), histone active sites (HA), and histone repressive sites (HR)). RESULTS: These regulatory regions showed to be distinct from each other by sharing less than 2.5% among all three types and more than 95% showed to be cell line-specific. Despite a lower total TE content overall than the genome average, each regulatory sequence type showed enrichment for one or two specific TE type(s): DHS for long terminal repeats (LTRs) and DNA transposons, HA for short interspersed nucleotide elements (SINEs), and HR for LTRs. In contrast, SINE was shown to be overrepresented in all three types of regulatory sequences located in gene-neighboring regions. TE-regulated genes were mostly shown to have cell line specific pattern, and tissue-specific genes (TSGs) showed higher usage of TE regulatory sequences in the tissue of their expression. While TEs in the regulatory sequences showed to be older than their genome-wide counterparts, younger TEs were shown to be more likely used in cell line specific regulatory sequences. CONCLUSIONS: Collectively, our study provided further evidence enforcing an important contribution of TEs to tissue-specific gene regulation in humans.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it