MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401233896 · doi:10.1111/rsr.17152

THE FINALITY OF THE GOSPEL: KARL BARTH AND THE TASKS OF ESCHATOLOGY. . Edited by KaitlynDugan and Philip G.Ziegler. Leiden: Brill, 2022. Pp. 229. Paper, N.p.

2024· article· en· W4401233896 on OpenAlex
Michael Brain

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueReligious Studies Review · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEurasian Exchange Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoWycliffe College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBrillGospelEschatologyPhilosophyTheology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The essays in this volume explore Karl Barth's famous claim, made in the second edition of Der Römerbrief, that “if Christianity be not altogether thoroughgoing eschatology, there remains in it no relation whatever with Christ.” The authors overturn the mistaken assumption that Barth's theology is eschatologically thin by unveiling the eschatological aspects of his writings, from Römerbrief to Kirchliche Dogmatik. The first essay, written by the late Christoph Schwöbel, is a brilliant reminder that eschatology is not about the end of the world as we know it but the apokalypsis of God in Christ, who comes to renew our world and redeem our time in resurrection. Contributions from John Barclay, Beverly Roberts Gaventa, and Douglas Campbell present noteworthy analyses of Pauline eschatological themes that will satisfy biblical scholars. One can only admire Christiane Tietz's essay, examining Barth's theodicy through his homiletical reflections on the death of his son, Matthias. Nancy Duff's essay is likewise concerned with the pastoral dimensions of Barth's eschatology, yet the essay's defense of physician-assisted death is less satisfying. Duff misunderstands the nature of Barth's dialectic, evidenced by her claim that accepting and resisting death means choosing when one ought to forestall the ending of one's life and when one should embrace death rather than maintaining each horn of the dilemma in tension. Similar misunderstandings follow Duff into her assumption that physician-assisted death is a means of accepting death rather than a collusion with the anti-God powers that oppose God's good purpose for creatures. The volume examines a wide array of Barth’s writings, including his commentary on 1 Corinthians, the lectures in Münster, and the various eschatological themes in Römerbrief and Kirchliche Dogmatik. Essays are both critical and appreciative, approaching Barth from the perspective of various theological disciplines and diverse aspects of his corpus. Scholars interested in Barth's “unfinished” eschatology will benefit from these essays.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.071
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it