MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401235038 · doi:10.1142/s1793524524500840

Global insights into a stochastic SIRS epidemic model with Beddington–DeAngelis incidence rate

2024· article· en· W4401235038 on OpenAlexafffund
Ruoshi Tang, Hao Wang, Zhipeng Qiu, Tao Feng

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Biomathematics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicCOVID-19 epidemiological studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNatural Science Foundation of Jiangsu ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsEpidemic modelApplied mathematicsIncidence (geometry)MathematicsComputer scienceEconometricsDemographyPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study develops a stochastic SIRS compartmental model for exploring the transmission dynamics of infectious diseases, integrating the Beddington–DeAngelis incidence rate and vaccination. In the deterministic case, the reproduction number [Formula: see text] is derived, and the global dynamics is analyzed using the Lyapunov function with respect to [Formula: see text]. The outcomes underscore that [Formula: see text] completely governs the overall dynamics of the system. In the stochastic case, the primary challenge arises from the two-dimensional boundary system, preventing the Fokker–Planck equation from obtaining the density function of the invariant measure. To address the weak convergence property regarding the invariant measure for both the stochastic system and its corresponding two-dimensional boundary system, the concept of limit measures is introduced. The theoretical results indicate that the persistence and extinction of the infectious disease are entirely determined by the Lyapunov exponent [Formula: see text], representing the long-term growth rate. Numerical simulations further support these findings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.129
GPT teacher head0.435
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of BiomathematicsSame topicCOVID-19 epidemiological studiesFrench-language works237,207