The Structural Basis for Recognition of Human Leukocyte Antigen Class I Molecules by the Pan-HLA Antibody W6/32
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The central immunological role of HLA class I (HLA-I) in presenting peptide Ags to cellular components of the immune system has been the focus of intense study for >60 y. A confounding factor in the study of HLA-I has been the extreme polymorphism of these molecules. The mAb W6/32 has been a fundamental reagent bypassing the issue of polymorphism by recognizing an epitope that is conserved across diverse HLA-I allotypes. However, despite the widespread use of W6/32, the epitope of this Ab has not been definitively mapped. In this study, we present the crystal structure of the Fab fragment of W6/32 in complex with peptide-HLA-B*27:05. W6/32 bound to HLA-B*27:05 beneath the Ag-binding groove, recognizing a discontinuous epitope comprised of the α1, α2, and α3 domains of HLA-I and β2-microglobulin. The epitope comprises a region of low polymorphism reflecting the pan-HLA-I nature of the binding. Notably, the W6/32 epitope neither overlaps the HLA-I binding sites of either T cell Ag receptors or killer cell Ig-like receptors. However, it does coincide with the binding sites for leukocyte Ig-like receptors and CD8 coreceptors. Consistent with this, the use of W6/32 to block the interaction of NK cells with HLA-I only weakly impaired inhibition mediated by KIR3DL1, but impacted HLA-LILR recognition.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".