MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401267581 · doi:10.47315/archives2024.339.007

Appraisal and Selection of Audiovisual Documents in the Focus of Foreign Historiography

2024· article· en· W4401267581 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueArchivi Ukraїni · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicDigital and Traditional Archives Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistoriographyObjectivity (philosophy)OriginalitySelection (genetic algorithm)Value (mathematics)HistoricismContext (archaeology)EpistemologyHistorySociologyComputer sciencePolitical scienceSocial scienceLawArtificial intelligencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this article is to analyze the state of development of the main theoretical-methodological and practical principles of appraisal and selection of audiovisual documents in modern foreign (North American) historiography, to determine their problems and further prospects for study. The methodology of the research is based on the principles of historicism, systematicity, objectivity with the use of general scientific (analysis, synthesis, abstraction and generalization; historiographical (specific-historiographical analysis and synthesis), historical (comparative-historical and chronological) methods. The scientific novelty lies in the fact that the article is the first attempt at historiographical reflection on the apprisal and selection of audiovisual documents (moving images) in modern North American archival thought. The conclusions are formulated that over the past forty years in the North American archival discourse, there has been an increase of interest in the appraisal and selection of audiovisual documents, which has grown into the formation of an independent research direction, as evidenced by the scientific achievements of Canadian and American archivists. In comparison with the ideas of American specialists, the originality and value of Canadian thinking is recognized, it consists in its ability to synthesize a number of appraisal methods (European and American), apply in practice and experiment with proposed models of criteria of the value of film and video documents not only at the level of state archives, but also archival departments of television and radio broadcasting companies. In general, the raised problem is quite complex and requires further study. In this context, it is considered relevant to study the European tradition of appraisal and selection of film and video documents, its influence on the past and current archival policies of acquisition of these documents. Attention is focused on the expediency of elucidating the peculiarities of the assessment and selection of audio and photo documents both in terms of individual national traditions and in the international perspective in particular. References: 1. Antonenko, I. (2007). Novi pidkhody do provedennia ekspertyzy tsinnosti dokumentiv (zarubizhnyj dosvid) [New approaches to conducting an examination of the value of documents (foreign evidence)]. Arkhivoznavstvo. Arkheohrafiia. Dzhereloznavstvo, 9, 27–38 [in Ukrainian].2. Bergeron, R. & Eamon, G. (1995). Selection Factors for Audio-Visual Archives. Annex B in Fading Away : Strategic Options to Ensure the Protection of and Access to Our Audio-Visual Memory. Task Force on the Preservation and Enhanced Use of Canada's Audio-Visual Heritage. 105 р. [in English].3. Bergeron, R. (1986). The Selection of Television Productions for Archival Preservation. Archivariа, 23, 41-53 [in English].4. Bergeron, R. (2007). Archiving Moving-Image and Audio-Cultural Works in Canada. Archivaria, 63, 55-74 [in English].5. Bezdrabko, V. V. (2019). Hans Hainrikh Booms i teoriia ekspertyzy tsinnosti dokumentiv [Hans Heinrich Booms and the theory of examination of the value of documents]. Sumskyi istoryko-arkhivnyi zhurnal, 32, 5–11 [in Ukrainian]. https://doi.org/10.21272/shaj.2019.i32.p.56. Bezdrabko, V. V. (2019). Teoretychni zasady ekspertyzy tsinnosti dokumentiv : tradytsii i suchasni trendy (iz zarubizhnoho dosvidu) [Theoretical principles of examination of the value of documents : traditions and modern trends (from foreign experience)]. Arkhivy Ukrainy, 4, 7–41 [in Ukrainian]. https://doi.org/10.47315/archives2019.321.0077. Boles, F. & Young, J. М. (1985). Exploring the Black Box : The Appraisal of University Administrative Records. The American Archivist, 48(2), 121-140 [in English]. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.48.2.1414g624328868vw8. Bonneau, G. (1993). Balises pour l’évaluation et le traitement des chutes de films : réflexion [Tags for the evaluation and treatment of film scraps : reflection]. Archives, 25(2), 3-15 [in French].9. Cartier, M. (1994). Sélection, traitement, diffusion et conservation des archives audiovisuelles : une approche nouvelle [Selection, processing, distribution and conservation of audiovisual archives : a new approach]. Argus, 23(1), 21-26 [in French].10. Chevigny, L. (2009). Le service Médiathèque et Archives de RadioCanada [Radio Canada’s Media Library and Archives service]. Argus, 38(2). 40–42 [in French].11. Connors, T. (2000). Appraising Public Television Programs: Toward an Interpretive and Comparative Evaluation Model. The American Archivist, 63(1). 152-174 [in English]. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.63.1.242683617n40849g12. Dick, E. (1997). «Appraisal of Collections» in The Administration of Television Newsfilm and Videotape Collections : A Curatorial Manual (pp. 31-47). Los Angeles : American Film Institute [in English].13. Dick, E. J. (1989). Through the Rearview Mirror : Moving Image and Sound Archives in the 1990s. Archivaria, 26, 68–73 [in English].14. Dick, E. J. (1991). An archival acquisition strategy for the broadcast records of the Canadian broadcasting corporation. Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television, 11(3), 253–268 [in English]. https://doi.org/10.1080/0143968910026026115. Francis, D. (2006). From Parchment to Pictures to Pixels Balancing the Accounts: Ernest Lindgren and the National Film Archive, 70 Years On. Journal of Film Preservation, 7, 21–41 [in English].16. Ide, M. & Weisse, L. (2003). Developing preservation appraisal criteria for a public broadcasting station. The Moving Image, 3 (1). 146–157 [in English]. https://doi.org/10.1353/mov.2003.000817. Kula, S. (1983). L’évaluation des images en mouvement en archivistique; étude du RAMP et principes directeurs [The evaluation of moving images in archival studies; RAMP study and guiding principles]. Paris : Unesco. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000057669_fre [in French].18. Kula, S. (2003). Appraising Moving Images : Assessing the Archival and Monetary Value of Film and Video Records. Lanham, Maryland : Scarecrow Press. 155 p. [in English].19. Kvitchenko, L. (1964). Deiaki pytannia vidboru fotodokumentiv na postiine zberihannia v oblderzharkhivakh [Some issues of selection of photo documents for permanent storage in regional state archives]. Naukovo-informatsiinyi biuleten, 1, 27-29 [in Ukrainian].20. Larose, K. M. (1978). Preserving the Past on Film : Problems for the Archivist. Archivaria, 6, 137–150 [in English].21. Levchenko, L. L. (2013). Amerykanski arkhivisty pro amerykanski arkhivy [American archivists about American archives]. Arkhivy Ukrainy, 3, 145–185 [in Ukrainian].22. Matuzewski, B. (1986). Une nouvelle source de l’histoire : création d’un dépôt de cinématographie historique [A new source of history : creation of a historical cinematography repository]. Retrieved from https://archive.org/stream/unenouvellesourc00matu/unenouvellesourc00matu_djvu.txt [in French]. 23. Moreau, J.-P. (1995). La sélection et la préservation des documents vidéo [The selection and preservation of video materials]. Archives, 27(2), 85-90 [in French].24. Prykhodko, L. F. (2013). Pytannia ekspertyzy tsinnosti arkhivnykh dokumentiv : zarubizhny dosvid na pratsiakh H. Dzhenkinsona [The issue of examination on the value of archival documents : foreign experience in H. Jenkinson’s works]. Studii z arkhivnoi spravy ta dokumentoznavstva, 21, 18–31 [in Ukrainian].25. Prykhodko, L. F. (2017). Ekspertyza tsinnosti audiovizualnykh dokumentiv : teoretychni zasady, naukovo-metodychni aspekty [Features of selection of audiovisual documents for permanent storage]. Arkhivy Ukrainy, 3–4, 95–119 [in Ukrainian].26. Saprykina, O. H. (2007). Pryntsypy ta kryterii provedennia ekspertyzy tsinnosti fotodokumentiv [Principles and criteria for the examination of the value of photo documents]. «Dokumentoznavstvo. Bibliotekoznavstvo. Informatsijna diialnist : problemy nauky, osvity, praktyky»: Materialy IV Mizhnarodnoi naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii (pp. 245–247) [in Ukrainian].27. Seliverstova, K. (2013). Osoblyvosti vidboru audiovizualnykh dokumentiv na postiine zberihannia [The issue of examination on the value of archival documents]. Studii z arkhivnoi spravy ta dokumentoznavstva, 21, 69-74 [in Ukrainian].28. Volkotrub, O. (2013). Publikatsii z pytan otsinky ta vidboru dokumentiv dlia arkhivnoho zberihannia u SShA na storinkakh zhurnalu «The American Archivist» (1940–2002 rr.) [Publications on the evaluation and selection of documents for archival storage in the USA on the pages of the magazine «The American Archivist» (1940–2002)]. Studii z arkhivnoi spravy ta dokumentoznavstva, 21, 7–17 [in Ukrainian].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.647
Threshold uncertainty score0.186

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchivi UkraїniSame topicDigital and Traditional Archives ManagementFrench-language works237,207