MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401286360 · doi:10.70000/cj.2021.63.8

Using internet things in information service in the Egyptian academic libraries: A study of Reality and planning for the future

2021· article· en· W4401286360 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ahmed Aly

Bibliographic record

VenueCybrarians Journal · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMobile Learning in Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThe InternetService (business)World Wide WebComputer scienceLibrary scienceBusinessMarketing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Internet of Things (IoT) technology is one of the tremendous technological developments in the current era. It refers to the use of intelligently connected devices and systems to leverage data gathered by embedded sensors and actuators in machines and other physical objects. IoT is expected to spread rapidly over the coming years as it will unleash a new dimension of services that improve the quality of life and productivity of enterprises. Hence, many countries aim to benefit from these technologies in various aspects of life in general and libraries and information institutions in particular. So, the current study sheds light on the ways of benefitting from (IoT) in developing and upgrading the services of Egyptian academic libraries and how to transform them into smart information institutions. It also identifies the readiness of libraries to adopt and apply (IoT) technologies. In addition, the study measures the readiness of libraries librarians to adopt the concept of smart libraries. In this regard, the study adopted the descriptive and analytical approach, using a set of tools, the most important of which are the questionnaire and the checklist. The study population included some of the Egyptian academic libraries in government universities representing the sectors of Greater Cairo, Delta, Central and Northern Upper Egypt, in addition to some libraries of private foreign universities at Egypt, namely (German University Library - British University Library - Canadian University Library).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.068

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0050.003
Scholarly communication0.0130.008
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCybrarians JournalSame topicMobile Learning in EducationFrench-language works237,207