Safety of Percutaneous Dilatational Tracheostomy in Critically Ill Adults With Obesity: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of endoscopic percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) in obese and nonobese critically ill adults. METHODS: A retrospective study of all cases of PDT performed at two academic health centers between 2016 and 2023 was conducted. Primary outcomes included peri- and postoperative complications stratified by both timing and severity. body mass index (BMI) data were stratified according to the World Health Organization classification (class I obesity defined as BMI ≥ 30, class II obesity ≥35 and <40, class 3 obesity ≥40). RESULTS: Totally 336 patients underwent a PDT, 279 of whom had available BMI data: 193 (69.2%) patients had a normal BMI, 56 (20.1%) had class I obesity, 15 (5.4%) class II obesity, and 15 (5.4%) class III obesity. The overall complication rates for the class I, II, and III obesity were 8.9%, 13.3%, and 13.3%, respectively. All procedures were successfully completed at the bedside (no conversions to an open approach), and there was no procedure-related mortality. The only accidental decannulation event was in a patient with class III obesity. There was no difference in overall complication rates between patients without obesity and patients with obesity (7.3% vs. 10.5%, respectively, p = 0.370). CONCLUSION: This study significantly expands the current literature and represents one of the largest studies to date reporting on PDT in patients with obesity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 134:5015-5020, 2024.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".