MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401301404 · doi:10.47522/jmm.v5i1.184

INTERVENSI GIZI SEBAGAI UPAYA PENCEGAHAN ANEMIA PADA REMAJA PUTRI DI WILAYAH KERJA PUSKESMAS PEKAYON JAYA KOTA BEKASI

2024· article· en· W4401301404 on OpenAlexaff
Della Yuliana, Dinda Sukma Tiara, Minasri Lestari, Nabila Fairuz Maulidya, Siti Chaerani, Syifa Kharisma Oleifera, Noerfitri Noerfitri

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Mitra Masyarakat (JMM) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPublic Health and Nutrition
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Overcoming nutritional problems around the Pekayon Jaya Community Health Center. Based on these problems, anemia in adolescent girls is the highest problem at the Pekayon Jaya Community Health Center. This activity was carried out in the Gema Karya Bahana High School, Bekasi City, because based on e-PPGBM data, the prevalence of cases of anemia in teenagers, especially young women, in 2023, the Gema Karya Bahana Vocational School area, Bekasi City, has the highest anemia problem with a prevalence of 64.6%. This intervention activity aims to increase the active role of young women in preventing and overcoming the health problem of anemia. Method: This community service activity was carried out at Gema Karya Bahana Vocational School, Bekasi City. The method used was consecutive sampling, namely the sample was selected according to research criteria, where the target of this activity was 25 young women in grades 10 and 12 at SMK Gema Karya Bahana, Bekasi City. Secondary data was obtained through web access for Community Based Nutrition Recording and Reporting (e-PPGBM). Meanwhile, primary data was obtained based on the results of direct field surveys. Research Result: Based on the results of the counseling and data processing that has been carried out, the results show that the correlation coefficient (Correlation) value is 0.522 with a significance value (Sig.) of 0.007. Conclusion: It can be concluded that the data is normally distributed, so it can be said that there is a relationship between the pre-test variables and the post-test variables.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal Mitra Masyarakat (JMM)Same topicPublic Health and NutritionFrench-language works237,207