Surgical management of iSGS in pregnant patients: Survey among North American expertise centers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To identify, group and document the surgical management of idiopathic subglottic stenosis (iSGS) in pregnant women among North American centers with expertise in the treatment of airway stenosis. BACKGROUND: Idiopathic subglottic stenosis is a rare airway disease that primarily affects women in their third to fifth decade of life. Symptoms of iSGS often worsen during pregnancy and can present as a threat to optimal maternal and fetal health; however there is a lack of evidence addressing the management of iSGS in pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-Sectional Survey Study. METHODS: A twenty-four question survey was designed to query the surgical management, ventilation, and perioperative considerations for pregnant patients with iSGS. Twenty-nine North American academic tertiary care centers with airway surgery expertise were identified. A designated surrogate for each center was contacted by email to distribute and obtain results of the survey. RESULTS: 17 centers responded. Most centers include differences in perioperative assessment such as frequency of consultation with a maternal/fetal medicine specialist. There is occasional use of a tocometer and rarely a non-stress test. Ventilation with intermittent jet ventilation or high-flow nasal cannula is favored. The surgical protocols include positional modifications, with pregnant patients in the left lateral decubitus position. The preferred timing for intervention is in the second or third trimester. CONCLUSION: This is the first national survey describing surgical and perioperative considerations for the pregnant patient with iSGS among centers with airway expertise in the United States and Canada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".