MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401306013 · doi:10.1093/noajnl/vdae090.026

BMRK-04 EFFECT OF PRIMARY CANCER SITE AND EXTRACRANIAL PROGRESSION ON DEVELOPMENT OF BRAIN METASTASES IN PATIENTS TREATED WITH STEREOTACTIC BODY RADIOTHERAPY FOR OLIGOMETASTATIC SOLID TUMORS

2024· article· en· W4401306013 on OpenAlexaff
Kevin Yijun Fan, Katarzyna J. Jerzak, Sudhir Kumar, Veronika Moravan, Badr Id Said, Sunit Das, Alexander V. Louie, Hany Soliman, Arjun Sahgal, Hanbo Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology Advances · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBrain Metastases and Treatment
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's HospitalSunnybrook Health Science CentreStatistics CanadaUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineProstate cancerColorectal cancerBreast cancerRadiosurgeryOncologyInternal medicineCancerLung cancerProportional hazards modelRadiation therapyPrimary tumorProstatePopulationKidney cancerIncidence (geometry)Metastasis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract BACKGROUND Patients with oligometastatic disease (OMD) may achieve long-term control with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). However, those who develop brain metastases (BrM) often have poor outcomes. We aimed to investigate variables associated with development of BrM in this population. METHODS Patients with ≤5 extracranial metastases from solid tumors treated with SBRT from 2008-2016 at Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre were included. We investigated the association between covariates and CIBrM (cumulative incidence of BrM) using Fine-Gray analysis with death as a competing risk, and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) using Cox regression. We investigated the association between widespread extracranial progression (≥5 sites) and CIBrM using a time-based conditional competing-risks analysis. RESULTS Among 404 patients, the most common primary sites were lung (32%), colorectal (26%), prostate (13%), breast (10%) and kidney (7%). Median follow-up was 49 months. Median PFS was 25 months and median OS was 70 months. 58 patients developed BrM, and 5-year CIBrM was 16%. The 5-year CIBrM was highest among patients with breast cancer (22%), lung cancer (15%) and kidney cancer (15%), and lowest among those with colorectal cancer (5%) and prostate cancer (0%). On multivariable analysis, primary site was associated with CIBrM (p<0.001), with colorectal cancer (HR 0.34) and prostate cancer (HR 0.00) associated with lower CIBrM compared to lung cancer. Time from primary diagnosis to OMD, number of extracranial metastases, location of metastases, and total planning target volume (PTV) were not associated with CIBrM. Development of widespread extracranial progression within 24 (HR 4.1, p=0.004), 36 (HR 3.7, p=0.013), 48 (HR 5.9 p=0.009) and 60 (HR 23, p=0.017) months of OMD diagnosis was independently associated with higher CIBrM. CONCLUSIONS Primary site and extracranial progression, but not baseline measures of OMD volume and distribution, are associated with development of BrM in patients with OMD treated with SBRT.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.545
Threshold uncertainty score0.679

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-Oncology AdvancesSame topicBrain Metastases and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207