MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401308333 · doi:10.3985/mcwmr.35.207

Reform and Repair Company in Practice

2024· article· en· W4401308333 on OpenAlexaff
Yasuyuki Takasu

Bibliographic record

VenueMaterial Cycles and Waste Management Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicCorporate Insolvency and Governance
Canadian institutionsBell (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

本稿では,筆者が運営しているリユース店3店舗の事例に基づき,需要の多い修理の内容や利用者の実態,またコロナ禍前後の利用者や修理内容の変化について報告する。コロナ前には冠婚葬祭用衣類等,高価な衣類のお直しや紳士革靴,婦人ピンヒール等の修理が多かったが,コロナ後にはこれらが激減した。高齢者のマインド変化やリモートワークの増加等が影響しているのではないかと考えられた。またコロナ禍で激減した需要は少しずつ回復してきているが,高齢者の客足の回復が遅れている。そこで,高齢者施設や個人宅を巡回訪問し,お直しを行うサービスを開始した。今後,他の支援ニーズにも対応する予定で,お直しの需要の掘りおこしのみならず,高齢者の安心・安全の確保にも貢献する事業としていく予定である。そのほか,修理サービスにおいてコミュニケーションが重要であること,次世代への技術の継承や経営改善等が今後の課題であることを述べる。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.082

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0060.019
Scholarly communication0.0130.007
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0050.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMaterial Cycles and Waste Management ResearchSame topicCorporate Insolvency and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207