MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Long-term follow-up from the phase 1/2 MajesTEC-1 trial of teclistamab in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.

2024· article· en· W4401327466 on OpenAlexaff
Alfred L. Garfall, Ajay K. Nooka, Niels W.C.J. van de Donk, Philippe Moreau, Manisha Bhutani, Albert Oriol, Thomas G Martin, Laura Rosiñol, María‐Victoria Mateos, Nizar J. Bahlis, Rakesh Popat, Britta Besemer, Joaquín Martínez‐López, Amrita Krishnan, Michel Delforge, Lin Huang, Deeksha Vishwamitra, Tara Stephenson, Katherine Chastain, Surbhi Sidana

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Cancer ResearchUniversity of Calgary
FundersJanssen Biotech
KeywordsMedicineRefractory (planetary science)Multiple myelomaInternal medicineOncology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

7540 Background: Teclistamab, the first approved B-cell maturation antigen × CD3 bispecific antibody (BsAb) with weight-based dosing for the treatment of patients (pts) with triple-class exposed relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), demonstrated rapid, deep, and durable responses in the pivotal MajesTEC-1 study. Here, we report updated results from MajesTEC-1. Methods: Eligible pts received teclistamab at the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D; 1.5 mg/kg subcutaneous QW preceded by step-up dosing) with the option to switch to Q2W dosing if a partial response or better after ≥4 cycles of therapy (phase 1) or complete response or better (≥CR) for ≥6 mo (phase 2) was achieved; pts not in ≥CR could switch due to adverse events (AEs). Pts could subsequently switch to less frequent dosing if they continued to demonstrate a response. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) assessed by independent review committee per International Myeloma Working Group 2016 criteria. AEs were graded per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.03. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was graded per American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy guidelines. Results: At median follow-up of 30.4 mo, 165 pts had received teclistamab at the RP2D. ORR was 63.0%, and responses continued to deepen, with 46.1% achieving ≥CR. 85.7% (48/56) of MRD-evaluable pts were MRD negative (10 -5 threshold). Median duration of response (mDOR) increased to 24.0 mo; median progression-free survival (mPFS) and overall survival (mOS) improved to 11.4 and 22.2 mo, respectively. For pts with ≥CR, mDOR, mPFS, and mOS were not yet reached, and estimated 30-mo DOR, PFS, and OS rates were 60.8%, 61.0%, and 74.2%, respectively. Of the 38 pts who remain on treatment, 37 have switched to a less frequent dosing schedule (eg, Q2W), all of whom maintained responses. Hematologic AEs (any grade/grade 3/4) included neutropenia (72%/65%), anemia (55%/38%), thrombocytopenia (42%/23%), and lymphopenia (36%/35%). Infections occurred in 79% of pts (55% grade 3/4). Of grade 5 infections, 18/22 were due to COVID-19, reflecting study conduct during the COVID-19 pandemic. Onset of new grade ≥3 infections generally decreased over time, which aligned approximately with the median time of switch to Q2W dosing; other factors, such as increasing use of IVIG, may also contribute to this trend. AEs leading to dose reduction (n=1) or discontinuation (n=8; 5 due to infection) were infrequent. No new safety signals were reported. Conclusions: With the longest follow-up of any BsAb in MM, teclistamab continues to demonstrate deep and durable responses, including in pts who switch to less frequent dosing. The safety profile of teclistamab remains consistent with that of BCMA-targeted bispecific therapies, with a notable decrease in new onset of severe infections with time. Clinical trial information: NCT03145181 / NCT04557098 .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.220
Threshold uncertainty score0.701

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.100
GPT teacher head0.456
Teacher spread0.356 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations77
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicMultiple Myeloma Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207