Atrial fibrillation variant-to-gene prioritization through cross-ancestry eQTL and single-nucleus multiomic analyses
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in the world. Human genetics can provide strong AF therapeutic candidates, but the identification of the causal genes and their functions remains challenging. Here, we applied an AF fine-mapping strategy that leverages results from a previously published cross-ancestry genome-wide association study (GWAS), expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs) from left atrial appendages (LAAs) obtained from two cohorts with distinct ancestry, and a paired RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) and ATAC sequencing (ATAC-seq) LAA single-nucleus assay (sn-multiome). At nine AF loci, our co-localization and fine-mapping analyses implicated 14 genes. Data integration identified several candidate causal AF variants, including rs7612445 at GNB4 and rs242557 at MAPT . Finally, we showed that the repression of the strongest AF-associated eQTL gene, LINC01629 , in human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes using CRISPR inhibition results in the dysregulation of pathways linked to genes involved in the development of atrial tissue and the cardiac conduction system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".