MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401329504 · doi:10.1109/tmtt.2024.3434428

A Compact Wideband Inductorless Cascadable Tunable True Time Delay

2024· article· en· W4401329504 on OpenAlexafffund
Zahra Kabirkhoo, Mohammad Radpour, Leonid Belostotski

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaThe Research CouncilUniversity of Calgary
KeywordsWidebandElectronic engineeringComputer scienceOptoelectronicsMaterials scienceElectrical engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a compact inductorless cascadable gigahertz-frequency true time delay (TTD) circuit implemented as a gm-C all-pass filter (APF) cell having poles and zeros prescribed by the Padé approximation. The proposed APF cell not only overcomes the large chip areas required by lumped-LC and transmission-line delay circuits, but it also maintains wide bandwidths by eliminating the need for dc-blocking capacitors or buffers, which are often necessary when cascading active APFs. In this article, we develop design equations and propose techniques to enhance bandwidth, improve phase linearity, and minimize delay variation across the bandwidth. Results were obtained using a 65-nm CMOS delay circuit containing four cascaded APF cells closely agreed with those of the postlayout simulations, achieving a delay tuning range of 300–500 ps over a 0.1–4-GHz bandwidth. Furthermore, the delay can be tuned to 550 ps, causing the bandwidth to drop to 3.55 GHz while still maintaining the delay-bandwidth product (DBW) of 1.95. The filter exhibited a worst case input of 1-dB compression point (IP1dB) of −21 dBm, while occupying an active area of 0.04 mm2 and dissipating 6.2 mW/cell from a 1.3-V supply. The APF demonstrated a delay-per-area metric at least 1.6 times higher than what was realized with prior gm-C APFs while also operating over a wider bandwidth, exhibiting a high DBW of 1.95, and maintaining a 3.3 dB gain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and TechniquesSame topicAntenna Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207