Light Emissive Nanocomposites Containing a Blue Fluorescent Dicationic Tetraphenylethene and a Red Phosphorescent [Mo<sub>6</sub>I<sub>8</sub>(OCOC<sub>2</sub>F<sub>5</sub>)<sub>6</sub>]<sup>2−</sup> Octahedral Cluster for Optical Writing
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract An emissive organic–inorganic hybrid material is obtained by a cationic metathesis between a blue fluorescent tetraphenylethylene‐based salt: [TPEIm 2 ]I 2 , and a red‐NIR phosphorescent octahedral molybdenum cluster compound: Cs 2 [Mo 6 I 8 (OCOC 2 F 5 ) 6 ]. As demonstrated by Single Crystal X‐Ray Diffraction, the hybrid [TPEIm 2 ][Mo 6 I 8 (OCOC 2 F 5 ) 6 ] crystallizes as a 2:2 dimer and emits in the red‐NIR area. Its emission properties are studied in the solid state and once embedded in poly(methylmethacrylate) by steady state and time dependent photoluminescence spectroscopy. They are further compared to the case in which the two starting salts are directly integrated in the polymer matrix. Obtained nanocomposites show evanescent UV‐2A optical writing and reading behavior, with color contrasts depending on how emitters have been introduced.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it