MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401342118 · doi:10.1038/s42005-024-01746-y

Manifestation of the quantum metric in chiral lattice systems

2024· article· en· W4401342118 on OpenAlexafffund
Francesco Di Colandrea, Nazanin Dehghan, Filippo Cardano, Alessio D’Errico, Ebrahim Karimi

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunications Physics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian Physics
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaUniversity of Ottawa
FundersUniversity of Ottawa
KeywordsLattice (music)QuantumMetric (unit)Theoretical physicsPure mathematicsMathematicsPhysicsQuantum mechanicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent years have seen a surge in research on the role of quantum geometry in condensed matter physics. For instance, the Aharonov-Bohm effect is a physical phenomenon where the vector potential induces a phase shift of electron wavepackets in regions with zero magnetic fields due to an obstruction in space associated with a magnetic flux. A similar effect can be observed in solid-state systems, where the topology of the Berry connection can influence electron dynamics. These are paradigmatic examples of how the dynamics can be affected by the system’s geometry. Here, we show that in chiral-symmetric processes the quantum metric has a measurable effect on the mean chiral displacement of delocalized wavefunctions. This finding is supported by a photonic experiment realizing a topological quantum walk and demonstrates an effect that can be attributed directly to the geometry of the state space. Advanced materials are characterized by complex mathematical properties such as the topology and geometry of quantum states. This work demonstrates that in some systems, the evolution of a particle’s spatial distribution is a direct measure of these properties: the relative displacement in two sublattices is found to be given by the quantum metric.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommunications PhysicsSame topicQuantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian PhysicsFrench-language works237,207