Photoperiodic dependent regulation of photosynthesis in the polar diatom Fragilariopsis cylindrus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Polar microalgae are exposed to dramatic seasonal changes in light availability, from continuous summer days to winter nights with rapid changes of the daylength in spring and fall. Under this challenging light climate, large diatoms spring blooms occur at the bottom sea-ice and underneath the icepack, accounting for a significant proportion of the annual marine primary production in the Arctic Ocean. The on-going earlier melt down of the snow and ice covers result in a stronger light penetration and consequent increase in irradiance at the bottom of the sea ice leading to earlier seasonal sea-ice diatom blooms under shorter daylengths. Therefore, elucidating the response of polar diatoms to different photoperiods will help to better understand the consequences of the changing arctic climate on their photosynthetic productivity. Methods: In this study, we characterized the response of F. cylindrus, a model polar diatom, across five different photoperiods with similar light and temperature conditions (30 μmol photons m-2 s-1 and 0°C respectively). Results: We report different photoacclimative strategies under shorter and longer daylengths, with the special case of prolonged darkness (mimicking winter polar night). We also observed a repeated daily regulation of the photochemistry and photoprotection parameters when cells were exposed to a light:darkness alternation, despite the constant and optimal light intensity during the light periods. Discussion: Our results highlight the ability of F. cylindrus to grow efficiently under a wide range of daylengths, finely adjusting the balance between photochemistry and photoprotection to make the best use of the available light, supporting sustained production and growth despite low light and temperature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".