MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401348569 · doi:10.1002/mma.10328

Quantum (or q‐) operator equations and associated partial differential equations for bivariate Laguerre polynomials with applications to the q‐Hille‐Hardy type formulas

2024· article· en· W4401348569 on OpenAlexaff
Jian Cao, H. M. Srivastava, Yue Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicMathematical functions and polynomials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLaguerre polynomialsMathematicsLaguerre's methodClassical orthogonal polynomialsBivariate analysisOrthogonal polynomialsPartial differential equationType (biology)Jacobi polynomialsPure mathematicsDifference polynomialsMathematical analysisApplied mathematicsAlgebra over a field

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Based on the extensive application of the ‐series and ‐polynomials including (for example) the ‐Laguerre polynomials in several fields of the mathematical and physical sciences, we attach great importance to the equations and related application issues involving the ‐Laguerre polynomials. The mission of this paper is to find the general ‐operational equation together with the expansion issue of the bivariate ‐Laguerre polynomials from the perspective of ‐partial differential equations. We also give some applications including some ‐Hille‐Hardy type formulas. In addition, we present the Rogers‐type formulas and the ‐type generating functions for the bivariate ‐Laguerre polynomials by the technique based upon ‐operational equations. Moreover, we derive a new generalized Andrews‐Askey integral and a new transformation identity involving the bivariate ‐Laguerre polynomials by applying ‐operational equations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.454
Threshold uncertainty score0.721

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.187
GPT teacher head0.450
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMathematical Methods in the Applied SciencesSame topicMathematical functions and polynomialsFrench-language works237,207