Bibliographic record
Abstract
While pulse oximetry using remote photoplethysmography (rPPG) is used in medicine and consumer health, sound theoretical foundations for this methodology are not established. Similarly to traditional pulse oximetry, rPPG oximetry uses two wavelengths to calculate the tissue oxygenation using the so-called ratio-of-ratios, R. However, the relationship between R and tissue oxygenation has not been derived analytically. As such, rPPG oximetry relies mostly on empirical methods. This article aimed to build theoretical foundations for pulse oximetry in rPPG geometry. Using the perturbation approach in diffuse approximation for light propagation in tissues, we obtained an explicit expression of the AC/DC ratio for the rPPG signal. Based on this ratio, the explicit expression for “ratio-of-ratios” was obtained. We have simulated the dependence of “ratio-of-ratios” on arterial blood saturation across a wide range (SaO2 = 70–100%) for several commonly used R/IR light sources (660/780, 660/840, 660/880, and 660/940 nm) and found that the obtained relationship can be modeled by linear functions with an extremely good fit (R2 = 0.98–0.99) for all considered R/IR pairs. Moreover, the location of the pulsatile volume can be extracted from rPPG data. From experimental data, we found that the depth of blood pulsations in the human forehead can be estimated as 0.6 mm on the arterial side, which points to the papillary dermis/subpapillary vascular plexus origin of the pulsatile volume.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".