MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401357178 · doi:10.1109/tccn.2024.3439628

Integrated Cognitive Symbiotic Computing and Ambient Backscatter Communication Network

2024· article· en· W4401357178 on OpenAlexaff
Chao Ren, Lei Sun, Haojin Li, Chen Sun, Haijun Zhang, Arumugam Nallanathan, Victor C. M. Leung

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceBackscatter (email)Cognitive radioComputer networkTelecommunicationsWireless

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ambient backscatter communication (AmBC) possesses signal reception and energy-harvesting capabilities, allowing providing wireless cognition through simple energy detection. In typical applications like industrial Internet of Things (IoT), cognitive AmBC (CAmBC) networks are required to offer passive communication, edge computing, and cognition capabilities. However, passive communication relies on the environment and has limited computing power, creating interdependencies among spectrum sensing, networking, and computational cognition. Moreover, the heterogeneous evaluation metrics for communication and computation make unified planning and management challenging. Therefore, this paper proposes the integrated cognitive symbiotic computing-AmBC (CSC-AmBC) based on symbiotic communication and cognitive radio. CSC-AmBC integrates AmBC communication and computational cognition capabilities in a task-oriented manner, sharing proximity and AmBC computing and communication (ACC) resources among primary and secondary tasks. Meta-Link with Tokens and two cognitive ACC reuse models is used to facilitate integration and enhance task execution efficiency, which introduces Places to accommodate the heterogeneous and variable ACC resources. Additionally, the task execution gain metric is introduced to evaluate the multi-task ACC resource utilization. Numerical results validate the cognition networking and the advantage of the proposed task execution gain of CSC-AmBC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and NetworkingSame topicIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingFrench-language works237,207