MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401357612 · doi:10.1109/tia.2024.3439254

Detailed Modeling of a Practical 1400MW Hydropower Plant and Real-Time Hardware Emulation for Governor Tuning Application

2024· article· en· W4401357612 on OpenAlexafffund
Ritu Tiwari, Thanga Raj Chelliah, Venkata Dinavahi

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Industry Applications · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReal-time simulation and control systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsEmulationGovernorHydropowerComputer scienceControl engineeringEngineeringEmbedded systemElectrical engineeringAerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents the detailed nonlinear mathematical model of a 1400MW hydro power plant (HPP) and it's faster than real-time dynamic emulation on hardware architecture of the field programmable gate arrays (FPGA). This model is used to study the interactive effect of hydro turbine governor system (HTGS) and power system stabilizer (PSS) in nonlinear hydro-mechanical and electrical coupled (HMEC) system during low frequency oscillations. The Hopf bifurcation technique is employed for oscillation stability study and to obtain the optimum and stable operating region of the PID controller in the governor. Furthermore, oscillation damping is enhanced by improved tuning of PSS considering governor's servo motor time delay and frequency dead-band. The methodology for improved HTGS and PSS tuning provides 10 sec faster frequency stability with higher positive oscillation damping. Improved stability is illustrated using frequency deviation and generator active power results. The model accuracy is validated using 1400MW HPP field data. HMEC dynamic model of HPP is implemented on reconfigurable parallel hardware architecture of the FPGA board Xilinx Virtex UltraScale+<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">TM</sup>, having the system solution pipelined for parallel computation, thus obtaining 49 times faster than real-time solution. This FPGA emulated prototype provides an advanced testing environment for new control strategies, system security assessment, predictive analyses of faults using real-time data, and plant optimization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.985
Threshold uncertainty score0.824

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Industry ApplicationsSame topicReal-time simulation and control systemsFrench-language works237,207