MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401358027 · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2024.3439608

High-Precision Intracity Temperature Estimation Based on Generated Point Clouds

2024· article· en· W4401358027 on OpenAlexaff
G. Huang, K. L. He, Yu Zang, Hang Shu, Lei Zhao, Jonathan Li, Cheng Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCalibration and Measurement Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Fujian Province
KeywordsRemote sensingTemperature measurementComputer scienceEnvironmental scienceGeologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Estimation of urban surface temperature is crucial for urban planning and emergency management. Due to the complexity of intracity structures, it is very challenging to acquire satisfied prediction errors of the land surface temperature (LST) at very high resolution, like 60-by-60 m. Considering this, we propose a low-cost method for generating urban point clouds via readily accessible city data. Then we design an efficient descriptor, geofeature distribution matrix (GFDM) to describe the complex intracity structure. Using GFDM, we introduce a 3-D urban structure guided temperature prediction network (3D-UP Net) to capture the complex relationship between urban structure, upper atmospheric conditions, and surface temperature. The proposed 3D-UP Net is generalizable, capable of predicting future surface temperature for existing cities and even for those that are planned. Experiments conducted in multiple regions of China demonstrate that our method’s error is less than 1.5 K (in most cases) at a high resolution (60-by-60 m).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.830
Threshold uncertainty score0.498

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote SensingSame topicCalibration and Measurement TechniquesFrench-language works237,207