MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401385277 · doi:10.1111/cns.14899

Safety and efficiency of deep brain stimulation in the elderly patients with Parkinson's disease

2024· article· en· W4401385277 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Weidong Wu, Shun Gong, Shimiao Wang, Wei Lei, Lijia Yuan, Wei Wu, Jiqing Qiu, Guoming Luan, Minwei Zhu, Xudong Wang, Guobiao Liang, Yingqun Tao

Bibliographic record

VenueCNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeurological disorders and treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsDeep brain stimulationParkinson's diseaseDiseaseMedicineStimulationNeurosciencePhysical medicine and rehabilitationInternal medicinePsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AIMS: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is not routinely performed in elderly patients (≥75 years old) to date because of concerns about complications and decreased benefit. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of DBS in elderly patients with Parkinson's disease. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed using data from 40 elderly patients from four centers who were treated with neurosurgical robot-assisted DBS between September 2016 and December 2021. These patients were followed up for a minimum period of 2 years, with a subgroup of nine patients followed up for 5-7 years. Patient demographic characteristics, surgical information, pre- and postoperative motor scores, non-motor scores, activities of daily living, and complications were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: , 0.81 ± 0.23 mm, and 77.63 ± 8.08, respectively. One patient developed a skin infection, and the device was removed. The Unified Parkinson's disease rating scale, Unified Parkinson's disease rating scale of Part III, tremor, rigidity, bradykinesia, axial, and Barthel index for activities of daily living (ADL-Barthel) scores significantly improved at the 2-year follow-up (p < 0.05). The levodopa equivalent daily dose (LEDD) was significantly reduced at the 2-year follow-up (p < 0.05). However, the Montreal cognitive assessment, Hamilton depression scale, and Hamilton anxiety scale scores did not significantly change during the 2-year follow-up (p > 0.05). Additionally, in the subgroup with a 5-year follow-up, the motor symptoms, ADL-Barthel score, and cognitive function worsened over time compared to baseline. However, there was still an improvement in motor symptoms and ADL with DBS on-stimulation compared with the off-stimulation state. The LEDD increased 5 years after surgery compared to that at baseline. Eleven patients had passed away during follow-up, the mean survival time was 38.3 ± 17.3 months after surgery, and the mean age at the time of death was 81.2 (range 75-87) years. CONCLUSION: Robot-assisted DBS surgery for the elderly patients with Parkinson's disease is accurate and safe. Motor symptoms and ADL significantly improve and patients can benefit from long-term neuromodulation, which may decrease the risk of death.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.102
Threshold uncertainty score0.204

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCNS Neuroscience & TherapeuticsSame topicNeurological disorders and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207