MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Effect of Hungarian Kin-State Politics on the Economic Life of Transcarpathia, Ukraine: A Snapshot of the Beregszász District between 2017 and 2020

2024· article· en· W4401390825 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Katalin Kovály

Bibliographic record

VenueHungarian Studies Review · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPost-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSnapshot (computer storage)PoliticsState (computer science)Political scienceGeographyLawComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Due to the frequent changes in ruling powers and shifting borders, in addition to the geopolitical situation of the region, Transcarpathia, the westernmost county of Ukraine, constitutes an especially suitable site for examining transnational ethnic kinship relations. The main aim of the present article is to shed light on the correlation between social-ethnic interactions and economic efficiency, paying special attention to the role of informal and formal ethnic relations in the activities of business actors and in their access to certain resources. The article analyzes how these processes have been influenced by Hungary’s kin-state politics. The research is based mainly on semi-structured interviews conducted with local Transcarpathian Hungarian and Ukrainian entrepreneurs as well as with the representatives of business organizations related to the given community and experts in the field. The investigation found that among Transcarpathian Hungarian entrepreneurs the role of formal ethnic relations has strengthened due to the financial support provided by Hungary, which was not the case for entrepreneurs belonging to the majority population. The extensive assistance by Hungary has given Hungarian entrepreneurs an advantage in accessing resources, which has caused some tension between Hungarian and Ukrainian entrepreneurs in Transcarpathia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.847
Threshold uncertainty score0.790

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHungarian Studies ReviewSame topicPost-Soviet Geopolitical DynamicsFrench-language works237,207