MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401409522 · doi:10.1016/j.foohum.2024.100373

Impact of information about nutritional benefits, sustainability and consumption on consumer acceptance and emotional response to smoothies containing brown seaweed, Ascophyllum nodosum

2024· article· en· W4401409522 on OpenAlexaff
Rachael Moss, Allison Stright, Lindsay Nicolle, Erin Richelle, Laura Baxter, Kaitlyn Frampton, Tanvi Dabas, Mackenzie Gorman, Matthew B. McSweeney

Bibliographic record

VenueFood and Humanity · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFood Industry and Aquatic Biology
Canadian institutionsAcadia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAscophyllumBrown seaweedConsumption (sociology)SustainabilityBrown algaeAlgaeBiologyBotanyEcologySocial scienceSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Seaweeds have been proposed as a sustainable and nutritionally beneficial ingredient to be incorporated into foods in the Western world. However, consumption of seaweed is still quite low. As such, this sensory trial presented information about the nutritional benefits, sustainability, and current consumption of seaweed to investigate how it impacted the participants’ (n = 132) sensory perception. Participants received the same smoothie sample containing brown seaweed ( Ascophyllum nodosum ) twice, once before and after receiving information about brown seaweed. The participants were presented with information about one of the following areas: the nutritional benefits, the sustainability of seaweed, or the current consumption of seaweed. The participants evaluated the sensory properties, their emotional responses and their liking of each sample. The nutritional information and consumption information had a positive impact on the sensory perception and hedonic scores of the smoothie sample, and led the participants to indicating that seaweed should be incorporated into more foods. The consumption information also impacted the emotional response (increased selection of “secure/at ease” and “relaxed/calm”). The sustainable information led to an increased perception of fishiness in the smoothie and a decreased perception of sweetness. The results identify that information about nutritional benefits and current consumption may be able to improve acceptance and sensory perception of food items containing seaweed. The presentation of nutritional benefits and current consumption on products could lead to an increased acceptance of seaweed-containing products by consumers living in the Western world. • Seaweed has been identified as a nutritional beneficial and sustainable ingredient. • Information (sustainable, nutritional, and traditional) was presented to participants. • Nutritional and traditional information increased hedonic scores. • Traditional information impacted participants’ sensory perception and emotional response.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.595
Threshold uncertainty score0.215

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFood and HumanitySame topicFood Industry and Aquatic BiologyFrench-language works237,207