MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401412972 · doi:10.1093/ageing/afae139.024

2159 Feasibility study: the use of the Edmonton frail scale in a psychiatric inpatient facility

2024· article· en· W4401412972 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Priya Shah, K Khongsueb, Esther Gathii, Kieran C. Breen

Bibliographic record

VenueAge and Ageing · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFrailty in Older Adults
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMental healthNeuropsychiatryDepression (economics)Multidisciplinary approachPsychiatryTest (biology)Gerontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Frailty is an important consideration in the health and wellbeing of older adults, particularly as it is associated with a risk of falls, and mental health difficulties such as depression. There has been no validation of frailty assessment tools among older adults with Psychiatric disorders. This was a feasibility study exploring the use of the Edmonton frail scale (EFS) among patients with highly complex mental health needs within a Psychiatric Inpatient Setting with a view to develop a service integration process leading to further research. Methods 45 participants were recruited from 8 older adult wards across Neuropsychiatry and Medium Secure divisions. EFS assessments were completed every six months by trained members of Multidisciplinary Teams over a 12-month period. Results: About 118 assessments were administered to approximately 45 patients, regardless of a patient’s length of stay at the hospital during the 12-month period. There was a 55% assessment completion rate. This was largely the result of difficulties in administering the cognitive domain of the EFS (Clock Drwing test) to patients with highly complex mental health needs, as the completion rate was 32%. It was also quite challenging for patients to understand and comply with the assessment instructions in the Functional Performance Domain (Timed Get Up and Go Test). As a result, many assessments in this domain were conducted through covert observation of patients’ movement during the course of the day. 29 of the 45 patients were found to have at least moderate level of frailty. Conclusion Older adults with psychiatric disorders may benefit from having an adapted assessment of the cognitive domain to promote complete administration of assessments. Prevalence of frailty is high in this setting. Continuous support towards staff engagement and education would be beneficial in promoting EFS use in determining frailty and integrating it into care planning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAge and AgeingSame topicFrailty in Older AdultsFrench-language works237,207