MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401414501 · doi:10.1109/twc.2024.3436534

On the Design of Artificial Noise for Physical Layer Security in Visible Light Communication Channels With Clipping

2024· article· en· W4401414501 on OpenAlexaff
Thanh V. Pham, Steve Hranilovic, Susumu Ishihara

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMolecular Communication and Nanonetworks
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of Science London
KeywordsArtificial noiseVisible light communicationComputer sciencePhysical layerClipping (morphology)Noise (video)TelecommunicationsWirelessSpeech recognitionArtificial intelligenceOpticsPhysicsLight-emitting diode

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Though visible light communication (VLC) systems are contained to a given room, improving their security is an important criterion in any practical deployment. This paper studies the design of artificial noise (AN) to enhance physical layer security in VLC systems in the context of input signals with no explicit amplitude constraint (e.g., multicarrier systems). In such systems, clipping is needed to constrain the input signals within the limited linear ranges of the LEDs. However, this clipping process gives rise to non-linear clipping distortion, which must be incorporated into the AN design. To solve the design problem, a sub-optimal approach is presented using the Charnes-Cooper transformation and the convex-concave procedure (CCP). Then, a novel AN transmission scheme is proposed to reduce the impact of clipping distortion, thus improving the secrecy performance. The proposed scheme exploits the typical structure of LED luminaries that are composed of multiple light-emitting chips. Specifically, LED chips in each luminaire are divided into two groups driven by separate driver circuits. One group is used to transmit the information-bearing signal, while the other group transmits the AN. Numerical results show that while clipping distortion can significantly reduce the secrecy level, with proper design AN significantly improves the secrecy performance using the proposed design methodology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Wireless CommunicationsSame topicMolecular Communication and NanonetworksFrench-language works237,207