MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401420454 · doi:10.1080/07853890.2024.2386524

Health-related quality of life in patients with palmoplantar pustulosis – a Swedish register study

2024· article· en· W4401420454 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Jenny M. Norlin, Sofia Löfvendahl, Marcus Schmitt‐Egenolf

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Medicine · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicPsoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNovartis PortugalJanssen AustraliaAbbVie CanadaLEO PharmaBoehringer Ingelheim
KeywordsPalmoplantar pustulosisMedicineQuality of life (healthcare)Register (sociolinguistics)DermatologyPsoriasisNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Real-world data on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in palmoplantar pustulosis (PPP) are scarce and few studies have analysed the generic HRQoL.Objectives To assess HRQoL using the generic EQ-5D instrument and the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) instrument in PPP compared to plaque psoriasis.Methods Cross-sectional data from PsoReg, the Swedish National Registry for Systemic Treatment of Psoriasis (2006–2021), were examined. The study included 306 patients with PPP, out of which 22% had concomitant plaque psoriasis (n = 68), and 7041 patients with plaque psoriasis only. EQ-5D and DLQI were compared between patients with PPP and patients with plaque psoriasis, overall and stratified by sex. A subgroup analysis compared outcomes for patients with PPP vs. patients with severe plaque psoriasis (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index ≥10). Multiple regression analyses were performed to control for potential confounders (age, sex, comorbidities, lifestyle factors).Results Patients with PPP were to a larger extent female (79% vs. 37%, p < .01) and older (mean [SD] age 59.9 [11.9] vs. 50.7 [16.0] years, p < .01) than patients with plaque psoriasis. EQ-5D values were significantly lower (worse) in patients with PPP (mean [SD] 0.622 [0.309]) compared to patients with plaque psoriasis (mean [SD] 0.715 [0.274]). No significant difference was observed compared to patients with severe plaque psoriasis (p = .237). DLQI was comparable in PPP and plaque psoriasis patients (p = .117). In the regression analyses, PPP only and PPP with plaque psoriasis were associated with lower EQ-5D values of 0.065 (p < .01) and 0.061 points (p < .10) compared to plaque psoriasis patients.Conclusions PPP had a substantial negative impact on patients’ generic and dermatology-specific HRQoL. Patients with PPP were worse off in terms of generic HRQoL compared with patients with plaque psoriasis when controlling for the impact of potential confounders.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of MedicineSame topicPsoriasis: Treatment and PathogenesisFrench-language works237,207