Community Integration Challenges of Men and Women After Traumatic Brain Injury: A Reflexive Thematic Analysis of Lived Experiences Through a Gender Lens
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate community integration (CI) challenges following traumatic brain injury (TBI) through a gender lens. SETTING: Rehabilitation research-teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Adult participants (22 men and 20 women) with a primary diagnosis of mild or moderate-severe TBI, in the acute or chronic stages after injury, were recruited using purposive sampling. DESIGN: Qualitative study. Data were collected through semistructured interviews, and thematic analysis was used to identify themes of CI challenges. RESULTS: Three overarching themes emerged: (1) lack of a " graduated home plan ": difficulty enacting gendered roles and responsibilities at home, (2) " Something that I cannot handle ": mismatch between occupational demands and abilities, and (3) " Slipping away ": disrupted connections with self and others. Men consistently voiced struggles with and inability to fulfill household tasks, whereas women detailed ways of adapting domestic responsibilities because of postinjury limitations. Productivity challenges resonated with a substantial number of participants, and a gendered pattern was observed: More women reported an inability, whereas more men reported a limited ability to meet occupational demands. Both genders conveyed disruptions in recreational and leisure activities, although women predominantly discussed challenges relating to social activities and men a tendency to avoid social situations because of anticipated stigma and/or shame. Across all themes, a pervasive sense of diminished community contributions and disrupted identities was observed. CONCLUSION: The incongruence between preinjury roles and responsibilities and postinjury abilities resulted in difficulties across multiple CI domains for the study participants and did not go unnoticed by them. It is important for health care professionals to assist patients in addressing gendered challenges at home, work, and in the social circle for a smoother transition back into the community.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".