Fear of cancer recurrence inventory (FCRI) in Spanish: validation in Mexican women with breast cancer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background/Objective. The Fear Cancer Recurrence Inventory (FCRI) evaluates fear cancer recurrence multidimensionally and proposes a clinical cutoff point. However, there has yet to be a translated Spanish version of the FCRI to date. This study aims to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the FRCI in women who completed primary treatment for breast cancer. Material and Methods. Recommendations of the International Test Commission were followed for cultural adaptation. Two hundred sixty-seven women who completed primary treatment for breast cancer participated in and responded to the Spanish version of the FCRI and the Supportive Care Needs Survey. Results. Two models are explored using AFC, the second order model χ2 (807, n = 265) = 1500.3, p < .001, χ2/gl = 1.85, CFI = .89, TLI = .89, RMSEA = .057 (90% confidence interval = .052–.061), and the seven related factors model χ2 (791, n = 265) = 1391.7, p < .001, χ2/gl = 1.75, CFI = .91, TLI = .90, RMSEA = .053 (90% confidence interval = .049–.058) obtained an optimal fit. Adequate-to-good Cron bach's alpha values and the interclass correlation index were acceptable for five of the seven dimensions (.68 to .83). Conclusion. The Spanish version of the FCRI has psychometric properties suitable for clinical and research use in Mexican populations. Objetivo. El Inventario de miedo a la recurrencia del cáncer (FCRI, por sus siglas en inglés) evalúa el miedo a la recurrencia de forma multidimensional y propone un punto de corte clínico. Sin embargo, hasta la fecha aún no existe una versión traducida al español del FCRI. Este estudio tiene como objetivo evaluar las propiedades psicométricas de la versión española del FCRI en mujeres que completaron el tratamiento primario para cáncer de mama. Material y Métodos. Se siguieron las recomendaciones de la Comisión Internacional de Pruebas para la adaptación cultural. 267 que completaron el tratamiento primario para el cáncer de mama participaron y respondieron a la versión en español del FCRI y a la Escala de Necesidades de Apoyo. Resultados. Se exploraron dos modelos usando AFC, el modelo de segundo orden χ2 (807, n = 265) = 1500.3, p < .001, χ2/gl = 1.85, CFI = .89, TLI = .89, RMSEA = .057 (90% intervalo de confianza = 0.052–0.061), y el modelo de siete factores relacionados χ2 (791, n = 265) = 1391.7, p < .001, χ2/gl = 1.75, CFI = .91, TLI = .90, RMSEA = .053 (intervalo de confianza del 90% = .049–.058) obtuvo un ajuste adecuado. Los valores de alfa de Cronbach obtenidos fueron de adecuados a buenos y el índice de correlación interclase fueron aceptables para cinco de las siete dimensiones (.68 a .83). Conclusión. La versión en español del FCRI tiene propiedades psicométricas adecuadas para uso clínico y de investigación en poblaciones mexicanas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".