MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Pain in patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders

2024· article· en· W4401431121 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Е. S. Novikova, А. С. Котов, С. В. Котов

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurology neuropsychiatry Psychosomatics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeuromyelitis opticaMedicineNeuropathic painExacerbationQuality of life (healthcare)Physical therapyFibromyalgiaChronic painSpectrum disorderInternal medicineMultiple sclerosisAnesthesiaPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) are a group of chronic autoimmune diseases of the central nervous system with a relapsing course. Unfortunately, the symptoms of exacerbation cannot always be completely stopped, and in addition to motor disorders, chronic pain and depression can worsen the patient's condition. Currently, one of the factors that significantly affects the quality of life of patients in this group is chronic, debilitating pain. Objective: to determine the prevalence of the pain syndrome in the population of NMOSD patients in Moscow region, to investigate its clinical characteristics and its impact on quality of life. Material and methods . The study included 33 patients with NMOSD (6 men and 27 women) aged 22 to 64 years. The following criteria were used to assess the neurological condition, presence and severity of the pain syndrome: Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), Diagnostic Neuropathic Pain Questionnaire (DN4), Pain Detect Questionnaire (PDQ), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), SF-36 Quality of Life Questionnaire, Beck Depression Inventory and MRI data. Results. Among the patients analysed, the pain syndrome occurred in 19 patients (57.6%): 4 patients with NMOSD without antibodies against aquaporin-4 (AQP4-) and 15 with antibodies against AQP4 (AQP4+). In this group, neuropathic pain was observed in 14 patients (11 – AQP4+ and three – AQP4-), pain due to spasticity in 6 patients (5 – AQP4+ and 1 – AQP4-), painful tonic spasms in 2 patients with AQP4+ and neuropathic itching – in 1 patient with AQP4-. According to the questionnaires of the seropositive patients, the median DN4 was 3 [2; 3] (here and below the data are given in Me format [25th; 75th percentile]), PDQ – 6 [5; 12], on the MPQ scale: pain rank index – 11 [9; 15], index of the number of selected symptoms – 3 [3; 4], pain intensity – 2 [1; 3]. The results for the physical and psychological health domains of the SF36 questionnaire were 35.9 [6.5; 36] and 50.5 [5; 51.5] respectively. Among AQP4+ patients, 7 out of 15 patients were diagnosed with depression; in the AQPpatients, only one man was diagnosed with depression. There was a statistically significant correlation between the age of the patients and pain level: neuropathic pain according to DN4 was more pronounced in younger patients (p=0.009), and neuropathic pain was significantly more severe in patients with an early onset of the disease (p=0.04). Conclusion. There is currently no clear approach for the treatment of pain in NMOSD. In the present small study, different causes of pain were identified, depending on the location and severity of the lesion, the age of the patient and the duration of the disease. The most important factor in the prevention and treatment of pain syndrome in NMOSD is probably adequate immunotherapy of the disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.051
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurology neuropsychiatry PsychosomaticsSame topicMultiple Sclerosis Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207